![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
Renaissance |
|||
![]() |
Desiderius Erasmus (c. 1469-1536) Hollandske teolog som påvirket Martin Luther |
![]() |
![]() Early Renaissance Adapted and compressed from 'A History of Europe' by Norman Davies, (Oxford) Chap VII The Renaissance is incomprehensible without reference to the depths of disrepute into which the medieval church, the previous fount of all authority, had fallen. In that process the Christian religion was not abandoned, but the power of the church was gradually corralled within the religious sphere: the influence of religion increasingly limited to the realm og private conscience. As a result the speculations of theologians, scientists and philosophers, the work of artists and writers, and the policies of princes were freed from the control of a church with monopoly powers and totalitarian pretensions. The great Renaissance figures were filled with self-confidence. They felt that God-given ingenuity, could and should be used to unravel the secrets of God's universe; and that, by extension, man's fate on earth could be controlled and improved. Here was the decisive break with the mentality of the Middle Ages, whose religiosity and mysticism were reinforced by exactly the oppsite conviction — that men and women were the helpless pawns of Providence.
Renaissance attitudes, in contrast, were bred by a sense of liberation and refreshment, deriving from the growing awareness of human potential. Speculation, initiative, experiment and exploration could surely be rewarded with success. Intellectual, literary and political historians analyse the beginnings from their own peculiar angle. Art historians look back to the painters Giotto and Masacio (1401-1428), to the architect Filippo Brunellesci (1379-1446), who measured the dome of the Pantheon in Rome in order to build a still more daring dome for the cathedral in Florence. Or to the sculptors Ghiberti (1378-1455) and Donatello (c.1386-1466). Every one of these pioneers was a Florentine. The causes of the Renaissance were as deep as they were broad. But the source of spiritual developments must be sought above all in the spiritual sphere. It is no accident that the roots of Renaissance and Reformation alike are found in the realm of ideas. The new learning of the fifteenth century possessed three novel features, the third of which was the rise of Biblical scholarship based on the critical study of the original Hebrew and Greek texts. This provided an important bond between the secular Renaissance. and the religious Reformation which was to place a special emphasis on the authority of the Scriptures.
Erasmus
He was a true protestant against the church's abuses, but took no part in the Reformation: a devoted humanist and a devoted Christian. His books remained on the Church's Index for centuries but were printed freely in England, Switzerland and the Netherlands.
Historians like to portray the Renaissance as a bipolar battle between the traditional narrow-minded Christian Church and enlightened humanists who saw the error of the church's ways. These latter innocently pursued their consciences while being persecuted by religious bigots. Notwithstanding its intentions, traditionalists belived that The Renaissance was the destruction of religion and ought to have been restrained. 500 years later, with the disintegration of Christendom far more advanced, it has been proved to be the source of all the rot. As one Catholic philosopher says: The Renaissance was not the Middle Ages plus Man, but the Middle Ages minus God. A Russian Orthodox commentator: Unfortunately the Renaissance also began to assert man's self sufficiency... God became the enemy of Man and Man of God. Dependance on God and conscience can easily be mistaken for self-sufficiency by an organisation that presumes to have a monopoly on spritual matters. In fact both in its fondness for pagan antiquity and in its insistence on the exercise of man's critical faculties, Renaissance humanism did indeed contradict the prevailing modes and assumptions of Christian practice, but not neccessarily Christian revelation. This third way belonged to many of the Renaissance masters, few of whom saw any contradiction between their 'humanism' and their religion, and most modern Christians would agree. Some developments deriving from the Renaissance, from Cartesian rationalism to Darwinian pseudo-science, have been judged by fundamentalists to be contrary to revelation, yet Christianity, defined as organised Church religion, has adapted and accomodated them. But despite the growing prominence of secular subjects, the overwhelming bulk og European art, for instance, continued to be devoted to religious themes; and all the great masters were great believers. These great innovative figures include Paolo Uccello ( 1397-1475), conqueror of pespective, Andrea Mantegna (1431-1506), master of realistic action, and Sandro Botticelli (1446-1510), the magical blender of landscape and human form and the three supreme giants Leonardo da Vinci, Raphael Santi and the mighty Michelangelo. Moreover the possession of a popular literary tradition in the vernacular was to become one of the key attributes of modern national identity. This tradition was established in English by the Elizabethan poets and dramatists Spenser, Marlowe and Shakespeare, whose plays expound many gospel truths. Clearly the Renaissance had something in common with the older movement for church reform. Humanists and would-be reformers both fretted against fossilized clerical attitudes and by encouraging the critical study of the New Testament, they both led the rising generation to dream about the lost virtues of primitive Christianity.
Gutenberg
State |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |